CO129-505-5 Robert A.J. Savage- continuity of service for pension 5-7-1927 - 22-12-1927 — Page 8

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

Mr. Clutterbuck

BIT. Huuli 20

Mr.

Br. Becket 20

Mr. E L Harding.

sascumbe

Sir C. Strachey.

Sir J. Shuckburgh.

Sir G. Grindle.

Sir C. Davis.

Sir S. Wilson.

Mr. Ormsby-Gore.

Earl of Clarendon.

Mr. Amery.

comm

DRAFT.

20/7

f.

SIR BASIL PETO, Bt., M.P.

30190/27 HK

CR3

Downing Street,

22 July, 1927

8

For Mr. Edgcumbe's signature.

was

I am/desired by Mr. Amery, to- immediate lepre this departure for 5. Apuca today, to

write to you to say that he has now looked into the

House of Commons,S.W.1.

case of Mr. R.A.Savage, late of Hong

Kong, about whom you wrote to him on

the 5th of July. No letter has been

received from Hr. Savage under date

th

of 30th of June, but it appears that

the Department had some correspondence

with him a few years ago in which the

position as regards his pension was

fully explained to him.

It is true that when Mr.Savage

was transferred from the Home Service

to Hong Kong it was arranged that there

should be no break in his service, which

should be regarded as continuous for

pension purposes. Mr. Savage at first

thought that he would be retired from

the

Page

9

the Home Service on transfer to Hong Kong

and the following explanation was given to

him in a letter from the Colonial Office

dated the 1st January 1902.

"Mr. Chamberlain regrets that he is

"unable to concur in your view of your

"position in regard to the Home Postal

"Service, inasmuch as you are not now

"being superannuated from that service,

"nor retired with a pension, but trans-

"ferred to the service of the Government

"of Hong Kong, while retaining your claim

"to pension in respect to your Home

"service, provided that you ultimately

"retire from the Hong Kong service under

"circumstances which would entitle you to

"a pension if you had continued in the

"Home Service".

This does not mean, as Mr. Savage

has since claimed, that on retirement from

Hong Kong he would receive one pension in

respect of his whole service, calculated

on his retiring salary, but that on his

retirement from Hong Kong in circumstances

entitling him to pension, he would receive

In respect of her Colonial savice a pension from the Colony, as well as a

pension from Imperial funds in respect of

There been a break baliem

his Home service. Had hiasavice-wrot

Page

DORK

age 9

age 9

Page

Page

ge 10

10

the Kamination this savice under the Home Govt

been secondes masaspire.,

auch the commencement this service under the 1tk Ent

tiba/, he would not have

wat fout

been eligible on retirement from

Hong Kong for a pension from Imperial

funds in respect of his Home service,

and the effect of his service being

continuous was to make him eligible

for pensions from a Hong Kong

respectively.

and the Home Governments pootúaf

for each

me portion of his

is unfortunate that Mr.

service,

Las since

It

Savage assigned

a different interpretation to the

correspondence, but the practice

followed in his case is in accordance

with that generally adopted in all

similar cases in conformity with

provisions of the Imperial and

Colonial Laws. Mr. Savage has thus

no basis for his complaint that he

has been unfairly treated, and Mr.

Amery is afraid that he can gain

nothing by pressing his claim.

A B

ge 10Page 11

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.